Analysis of Water Stress in Different Varieties of Maize (Zea mays L.) at the Early Seedling Stage

Main Article Content

Kiran Ramesh Pawar
Sopan Ganpatrao Wagh
Pravin Prakash Sonune
Sakshi Raju Solunke
Shubham Babanrao Solanke
Sandeep G. Rathod
Sanjay N. Harke

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is a widely grown crop with a high rate of photosynthetic activity due to its C4 pathway leading to higher yields of grain and a potential for biomass. It is predominantly cross-pollinated crop, a feature that has contributed to its wide morphological variability and geographical adaptability. Abiotic stress such as drought stress negatively affects plant growth and development. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of drought stress on the morphological and biochemical content of seven different maize varieties. Here we have tested 7 different varieties of maize from the Marathwada region of Maharshtra, India. One week old plants have been affected by drought stress. After one week of drought stress, the plants were subjected to various morphometric and biochemical tests. The results showed that water stress treatment significantly affects root length, shoot length and fresh biomass of seven different varieties, i.e. TMMH 806, NMH 1008, DELTA 10V30, INDAM 1122, SRIKAR 3555, DKC 9141, SGA. Drought stress also had a negative impact on chlorophyll and proline content. Result further exhibited that based on drought tolerance index, variety SRIKAR 3555 could be ranked as drought tolerant and NMH 1008 as drought-sensitive, while remaining cultivator ranked as drought intermediates.

Keywords:
Maize (Zea mays L.), drought tolerance, abiotic stresses

Article Details

How to Cite
Pawar, K. R., Wagh, S. G., Sonune, P. P., Solunke, S. R., Solanke, S. B., Rathod, S. G., & Harke, S. N. (2020). Analysis of Water Stress in Different Varieties of Maize (Zea mays L.) at the Early Seedling Stage. Biotechnology Journal International, 24(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.9734/bji/2020/v24i130094
Section
Original Research Article

References

Cohen JE. Human population: The next half-century. Science. 2003;302:1172–1175.

Eberhard S, Finazzi G, Wollman FA. The dynamics of photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2008;42:463515.

Von Caemmerer S, Quick WP, Furbank RT. The development of C4 rice: Current progress and future challenges. Science. 2012;336:1671.

Pohare MB, Akita M. Development of a precursor in a soluble form for protein import into chloroplasts. International Journal of Bio-Technology and Research. 2016;6(5):918.

Akita M, Pohare MB. Chloroplastic protein import characteristics of Dihydrofolate Reductase (DHFR) fused recombinant precursor protein in the presence of methotrexate. Biosci., Biotechnol. Res. Asia. 2016b;13(4):2351-2358.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bbra/2405

Dandve MS, Wagh SG, Bhagat PR, Pawar K, Timake SA, Daspute AA, Pohare MB. Bacterial and fungal pathogen synergetics after co-infection in the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biotechnology Journal International. 2019;23(4):1-9.
Available:https://doi.org/10.9734/bji/2019/v23i430085

Pohare MB, Rathod HP, Shahakar SB, Kelatkar SK, Suryawanshi PP. Effects of UV radiations on morphological characters in in vitro regenerated Polianthes tuberosa. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2012b;3:1307-1308.

Pohare MB, Batule BS, Bhor SA, Shahakar SB, Kelatkar SK, Varandani SP. Effect of Gamma Radiations on the Morphological Characters in in vitro Regenerated Polianthes tuberosa. Indian Horticulture Journal. 2013;3:95-97.

Pawar KR, Wagh SG, Daspute AA, Avhad GB, Choudharee PD, Harke SN. In vitro regeneration of potato (KufriPukhraj) Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phyto-chemistry. 2019;8(5):515-518.

Wagh SG, Kobayashi K, Yaeno T, Yamaoka N, Masuta C, Nishiguchi M. Rice necrosis mosaic virus, a fungal transmitted Bymovirus: Complete nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNAs and sub-grouping of bymoviruses. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2016b;82:38-42.

Wagh SG, Pohare MB. Current and future prospects of plant breeding with CRISPR/Cas. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2019;38(3):1-17. Available:https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2019/v38i330360

Clark RB. Effects of aluminium and mineral elements of Al-intolerant corn. Plant Soil. 1977;47:653-662.

Anonymous. Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan. Statistics Div., GOP, Islamabad, Pakistan; 1997.

Liu DH, Jiang WS, Hou WQ. Uptake and accumulation of copper by roots and shoots of maize (Zea mays L.). J. Envirin. Sci. 2001;13:228-232.

FAOSTAT. Production-crops data. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations; 2014.
Available:http://www.faostat.fao.org/site/567

Kumar R, Srinivas K, Sivaramane N. Assessment of the maize situation, outlook and investment opportunities in India. Country Report – Regional Assessment Asia (MAIZE-CRP), National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, India; 2013.

Shi GY, Liao WX, Qin LF and Lu LL. PEG simaulated water stress effects on physiological and biochemistry indexes of germination of Toonasinensis seeds. Journal of Forestry Sci and Tech. 2009;4: 142-145.

Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science. 2011;333:616-620.

Langridge P, Reynolds MP. Genomic tools to assist breeding for drought tolerance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015;32:130- 135.

Obidiegwu JE, Bryan GJ, Jones HG, Prashar A. Coping with drought: Stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 2015;6:220-230.

Athar HR, Ashraf M. Strategies for crop improvement against salinity and drought stress: An overview. In: Salinity and water stress: Improving crop efficiency. Series; Tasks for Vegetation Science. 2009;34:1-16

Huang R, Birch CJ, Gorge DC. Water use efficiency in maize production the challenge and improvement strategies, Maize Association of Australia; 2006.

Lobell DB, Roberts MJ, Schlenker W, Braun N, Little BB, Rejesus RM, Hammer GL. Greater Sensitivity to Drought. 2014; 344(6183):516-9.

Hameed M, Batool S, Naz N, Nawaz T, Ashraf M. Leaf structural modifications for drought tolerance in some differentially adapted ecotypes of blue panic (Panicum antidotale Retz.). Acta Physiol Plant. 2012;34(4):1479-1491.

Arnon DI, Allen M, Whatley F Photosynthesis by isolated chloroplasts IV. General concept and comparison of three photochemical reactions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1956;20:449-461.

Bates L, Waldren R Teare I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1):205-207.

Nisa V, Nisa W, Dar ZA, Wani MA, Gupta V, Kak A, Jaco SR. Impact of climate change maize productivity. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2019;8(2):83-94.

Weraduwage SM, Chen J, Anozie FC, Morales A, Weise SE, Sharkey TD. The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in plant science. 2015;6: 167.

Fischer RA, Sanchez M. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. Effects on plant water relation. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1979;30:801-814.

Otoole JC, Chang TT. Drought resistance in cereals: Rice. A Case Study. 1979;373-405.

González L, González-Vilar M. Deter-mination of relative water content. Depto Bioloxía Vexetal e Ciencia do Solo, Universidade de Vigo, Spain; 2001.

Olaoye GL. Screening for moisture deficit tolerance in four maize (Zea mays L.) populations derived from drought-tolerant inbred x adapted cultivar crosses. Tropic. Subtropic. Agroecol. 2009;10:237–251.

Abo-El-Kheir MSA, Mekki BB. The response of maize single cross to water deficits during silking and grain filling stages. World J. Agric. Sci. 2007;3:269–272.

Hurd E. Phenotype and drought tolerance in wheat. Agriculture Meteorology, Amsterdam. 1974;14:39-55.

Camacho RG, Caraballo DF. Evaluation of morphological characteristics in Venezuelan Maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under Drought Stress. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.). 1994;51(3): 453-458.

Prabhu LP, Shivaji P. Meeting world maize needs: Technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT World Maize Facts and Trends; 2000.

Zhu JK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. Molecular aspects of osmotic stress in plants, Critical Rev. in Plant Sci. 1997;16: 253-277.

Turner NC. Crop water deficits: A decade of progress. Adv. Agron. 1986;391-51.

Wagh SG, Daspute AA, Akhter SM, Bhor SA, Kobayashi K, Nishiguchi M. Relationship between resistance to Rice necrosis mosaic virus and expression levels of rice RNA dependent RNA polymerase 6 (OsRDR6) in various rice cultivars, JARQ; 2019. (In press).

Wagh SG. Comparative updates on Host-Induced Gene Silencing and CRISPR- Cas9 Utilization for Improved Disease Resistance in Crops, Research Journal of Biotechnology; 2019. (In press).

Pohare MB, Sharma M, Wagh SG. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and its medical potential. In Kumar S (Ed.), Advances in Biotechnology and Biosciences. Pusa, India. AkaNik Publications. 2019;69-90.