Comparative Physiological, Biochemical and Transcript Response to Drought in Sorghum Genotypes

Main Article Content

Joseph Noble Amoah
Daniel Antwi-Berko

Abstract

Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is considered as an important staple crop in the tropical regions. However, the productivity of this useful crop is hindered by drought which contributes to significant yield reduction. The present study aimed to decipher the effects of drought stress on physiological, biochemical and gene expression changes in sorghum genotypes and to ascertain the differences in their response to drought stress. To achieve these objectives, six sorghum genotypes were grown in pot culture in a greenhouse, in a randomized complete block design and exposed to water stress treatment for 10 days. From the study, drought stress caused a significant (P < .05) reduction in plant height, leaf water and chlorophyll contents while the proline, malondialdehyde (MDA), soluble sugar, electrolyte leakage (EL), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and antioxidant enzymes activity increased significantly (P < .05) and differentially in all sorghum genotypes. Among the genotypes investigated, PI 585456 showed enhanced performance and was considered as the most tolerant to drought in relation to plant growth and water relation, membrane status, photosynthetic activity, ROS and osmolytes accumulation and antioxidant enzymes activity. Furthermore, the transcript expression analyses of different categories of drought-responsive genes, viz; antioxidant-related, osmolytes biosynthesis-related, dehydrin-related, photosystem-related and transcription-related were differentially upregulated in sorghum genotypes investigated. The results revealed the differences in metabolic response to drought among the genotypes, which accentuated the physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanism related to a specific response that may play a vital role in drought tolerance in sorghum.

Keywords:
Sorghum, genotype, drought stress, metabolic response, transcript analysis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Amoah, J. N., & Antwi-Berko, D. (2020). Comparative Physiological, Biochemical and Transcript Response to Drought in Sorghum Genotypes. Biotechnology Journal International, 24(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.9734/bji/2020/v24i330102
Section
Original Research Article

References

Kidambi SP, Krieg DR, Rosenow DTJPP. Genetic variation for gas exchange rates in grain sorghum. Am Soc Plant Biol. 1990;92(4):1211-1214.

Amouzou KA, Lamers JP, Naab JB, Borgemeister C, Vlek PL, Becker MJFCR. Climate change impact on water-and nitrogen-use efficiencies and yields of maize and sorghum in the northern Benin dry savanna, West Africa. Field Crops Res. 2019;235:104-117.

Kanton R, Atokple I, Dogbe W, Kasei CJGJoAS: Effects of sowing dates on grain yield and yield attributes of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench) cultivar ICSV111 (Kapaala) in northern Ghana. Ghana J. Agric. Sci. 2007;40(1): 11-20.

Bell JM, Schwartz R, McInnes KJ, Howell T, Morgan CLJAwm. Deficit irrigation effects on yield and yield components of grain sorghum. Agric Water Manag. 2018;203:289-296.

Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra S. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. In: Sustain agric. Springer. 2009;153-188.

Akbudak MA, Filiz E, Kontbay KJB. DREB2 (dehydration-responsive element-binding protein 2) type transcription factor in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor): Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression profiles under cadmium and salt stresses. 3 Biotech. 2018;8(10):426.

Dicko MH, Gruppen H, Barro C, Traoré AS, van Berkel WJ, Voragen AGJJoCE. Impact of phenolic compounds and related enzymes in sorghum varieties for resistance and susceptibility to biotic and abiotic stresses. J. Chem. Ecol. 2005;31(11):2671-2688.

Zamora A, Sun Q, Hamblin MT, Aquadro CF, Kresovich SJMb. Evolution: Positively selected disease response orthologous gene sets in the cereals identified using Sorghum bicolor L. Moench expression profiles and comparative genomics. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26(9):2015-2030.

Ahmed IM, Nadira UA, Bibi N, Cao F, He X, Zhang G, Wu FJE, Botany E. Secondary metabolism and antioxidants are involved in the tolerance to drought and salinity, separately and combined, in Tibetan wild barley. Environ. Exp. 2015;111:1-12.

Horrer D, Flütsch S, Pazmino D, Matthews JS, Thalmann M, Nigro A, Leonhardt N, Lawson T, Santelia DJCB. Blue light induces a distinct starch degradation pathway in guard cells for stomatal opening. Curr Biol. 2016;26(3):362- 370.

Zhang Q, Gong M, Yuan J, Hou Y, Zhang H, Wang Y, Hou XJIJoA. Biology: Dark septate endophyte improves drought tolerance in sorghum. Int. J Agr Biol. 2017;19(1).

Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CFJWr. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Ann. App Biol. 1974;14(6):415-421.

Hoagland DR, Arnon DIJCCaes. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric Expt Station. 1950;347(2nd edit).

Su X, Wei F, Huo Y, Xia Z. Comparative physiological and molecular analyses of two contrasting flue-cured tobacco genotypes under progressive drought stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8(827).

Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Gill SS, Alharby HF, Razafindrabe BH, Fujita MJFips. Hydrogen peroxide pretreatment mitigates cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Brassica napus L.: An intrinsic study on antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:115.

Huo Y, Wang M, Wei Y, Xia ZJFips. Overexpression of the maize psbA gene enhances drought tolerance through regulating antioxidant system, photosynthetic capability, and stress defense gene expression in tobacco. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;6:1223.

Chen D, Wang S, Cao B, Cao D, Leng G, Li H, Yin L, Shan L, Deng XJFiPS. Genotypic variation in growth and physiological response to drought stress and re-watering reveals the critical role of recovery in drought adaptation in maize seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;6: 1241.

Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare IJP. Soil: Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1):205-207.

Xu W, Cui K, Xu A, Nie L, Huang J, Peng SJApp. Drought stress condition increases root to shoot ratio via alteration of carbohydrate partitioning and enzymatic activity in rice seedlings. Acta Physiol Plant. 2015;37(2):9.

Meher, Shivakrishna P, Ashok Reddy K, Manohar Rao D. Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content, relative water content (RWC), and chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25(2):285-289.

Liu J, Li J, Su X, Xia Z. Grafting improves drought tolerance by regulating antioxidant enzyme activities and stress-responsive gene expression in tobacco. Environ Expt Bot. 2014;107:173-179.

Behnamnia M, Kalantari KM, Ziaie J. The effects of brassinosteroid on the induction of biochemical changes in Lycopersicon esculentum under drought stress. Turk J Bot. 2009;33:417-428.

Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochem. 1976;72(1):248-254.

Guo YY, Yu HY, Yang MM, Kong DS, Zhang YJ. Effect of drought stress on lipid peroxidation, osmotic adjustment and antioxidant enzyme activity of leaves and roots of Lycium ruthenicum Murr. Seedling. Rus J Plant Physiol. 2018;65(2):244-250.

Devnarain N, Crampton BG, Chikwamba R, Becker JV, O'Kennedy MMJSAJoB. Physiological responses of selected African sorghum landraces to progressive water stress and re-watering. S Afr J Bot. 2016;103:61-69.

Mindaye TT, Mace ES, Godwin ID, Jordan DRJTCJ. Heterosis in locally adapted sorghum genotypes and potential of hybrids for increased productivity in contrasting environments in Ethiopia. Crop J. 2016;4(6):479-489.

Nxele X, Klein A, Ndimba BJSAjob. Drought and salinity stress alters ROS accumulation, water retention and osmolyte content in sorghum plants. S Afr J Bot. 2017;108:261-266.

Aranjuelo I, Molero G, Erice G, Avice JC, Nogués SJJoeb. Plant physiology and proteomics reveals the leaf response to drought in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). J Expt Bot. 2010;62(1):111-123.

Kumar M, Hasan M, Arora A, Gaikwad K, Kumar S, Rai RD, Singh AJIJoPP. Sodium chloride-induced spatial and temporal manifestation in membrane stability index and protein profiles of contrasting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under salt stress. Ind J Plant Physiol. 2015;20(3):271-275.

Ahmed IM, Nadira UA, Cao F, He X, Zhang G, Wu FJP. Physiological and molecular analysis on root growth associated with the tolerance to aluminum and drought individual and combined in Tibetan wild and cultivated barley. Plant. 2016;243(4):973-985.

Su X, Wei F, Huo Y, Xia ZJFiPS. Comparative physiological and molecular analyses of two contrasting flue-cured tobacco genotypes under progressive drought stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:827.

Selote DS, Khanna-Chopra R. Antioxidant response of wheat roots to drought acclimation. Protoplasma. 2010;245(1):153-163.

Hu L, Xie Y, Fan S, Wang Z, Wang F, Zhang B, Li H, Song J, Kong L. Comparative analysis of root transcriptome profiles between drought-tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to water stress. Plant Sci. 2018;272:276-293.

Raza MAS, Saleem MF, Shah GM, Khan IH, Raza A: Exogenous application of glycinebetaine and potassium for improving water relations and grain yield of wheat under drought . J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2014;14:348-364.

Xu W, Cui K, Xu A, Nie L, Huang J, Peng S. Drought stress condition increases root to shoot ratio via alteration of carbohydrate partitioning and enzymatic activity in rice seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plant. 2015;37(2):9.

Zhu J-KJAropb. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. 2002;53(1): 247-273.

You J, Chan Z. ROS Regulation During Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1092-1092.

Choudhury S, Panda P, Sahoo L, Panda SK. Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8(4):e23681.

Prashanth S, Sadhasivam V, Parida AJTR. Over expression of cytosolic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase from a mangrove plant Avicennia marina in indica rice var Pusa Basmati-1 confers abiotic stress tolerance. Trans Res. 2008;17(2):281-291.

Bian S, Jiang Y. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression patterns in leaves and roots of Kentucky bluegrass in response to drought stress and recovery. Sci Hort. 2009;120(2):264-270.

Alam NB, Ghosh AJPp. Biochemistry: Comprehensive analysis and transcript profiling of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa catalase gene family suggests their specific roles in development and stress responses. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;123:54-64.

Dossa K, Li D, Wang L, Zheng X, Liu A, Yu J, Wei X, Zhou R, Fonceka D, Diouf D, et al. Transcriptomic, biochemical and physio-anatomical investigations shed more light on responses to drought stress in two contrasting sesame genotypes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8755.

Zegaoui Z, Planchais S, Cabassa C, Djebbar R, Belbachir OA, Carol P. Variation in relative water content, proline accumulation and stress gene expression in two cowpea landraces under drought. J Plant Physiol. 2017;218:26-34.

Bandurska H, Niedziela J, Pietrowska-Borek M, Nuc K, Chadzinikolau T, Radzikowska D: Regulation of proline biosynthesis and resistance to drought stress in two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes of different origin. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;118:427-437.

Yu Y, Bi C, Wang Q, Ni ZJB. communications br: Overexpression of TaSIM provides increased drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Biochem Physiol Res. 2019;512(1):66-71.

Wu J, Chen J, Wang L, Wang S. Genome-Wide Investigation of WRKY Transcription Factors Involved in Terminal Drought Stress Response in Common Bean. Front Plant Physiol. 2017;8(380).

Saidi MN, Mergby D, Brini FJPP. Biochemistry: Identification and expression analysis of the NAC transcription factor family in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum). Plant Physio Biochem. 2017;112:117-128.

Gupta S, Mishra VK, Kumari S, Raavi, Chand R, Varadwaj PK. Deciphering genome-wide WRKY gene family of Triticum aestivum L. and their functional role in response to Abiotic stress. Genes Genome. 2019;41(1):79-94.