Genome Editing: A Strategic Tool to Advance Poultry Production in the Tropics

Ewuola Muslim Kayode *

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.

Akani, Basheerat Temitope

Department of Animal Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technonlogy, Kumasi, Ghana.

Fatai, Rasheed Babatunde

Department of Animal Science, Animal Breeding and Genetics Unit, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Ajenifujah-Solebo Shakira

Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics Genetics, National Biotechnology Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The output of poultry genetic resources (PGR) can be greatly increased by the use of the very powerful tool known as genome editing. Poultry farming is significant in the tropics because it significantly raises household income and the level of living. Increasing PGR production in the tropics requires overcoming several challenges, such as high rates of disease prevalence and resistance, subpar performance, and adverse environmental conditions. However, the application of genome editing technology presents a promising opportunity to address these problems and maximise poultry output in tropical regions.

In poultry production, selective breeding has resulted in notable improvements in output, effectiveness, and product quality. However, modifying characteristics linked to health becomes more difficult. In the tropics, high temperatures, high humidity, and other challenging conditions are often observed, and they can have a negative impact on the well-being and output of PGR. By using genome editing, it is possible to introduce genetic modifications that increase poultry resistance to these conditions.

Optimising meat yield and quality by genome editing provides a targeted and effective way to introduce disease resistance. Through precise DNA modification, researchers may make specific genetic alterations in organisms through precision genome editing. Benefits including disease resistance, increased welfare and feed conversion efficiency, and better adaption to tropical climates can be inserted into poultry species by scientists through the use of genome editing technology. Particularly in the tropics where infectious diseases can have a major negative influence on flock health and productivity, disease management is an essential component of chicken farming.

Keywords: Genome editing, poultry production, tropical climate, gene modification, CRISPR/Cas9


How to Cite

Kayode, E. M., Temitope, A. B., Babatunde , F. R., & Shakira , A.-S. (2024). Genome Editing: A Strategic Tool to Advance Poultry Production in the Tropics. Biotechnology Journal International, 28(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.9734/bji/2024/v28i3719

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wu G. Dietary protein intake and human health. Food and Function. 2016;7(3): 1251-65.

Matsuoka R, Takahashi Y, Kimura M, Masuda Y, Kunou M. Heating has no effect on the net protein utilisation from egg whites in rats. The Scientific World Journal. 2017;1-5

Byun SJ, Yuk SS, Jang YJ, Choi H, Jeon MH, Erdene-Ochir TO. Transgenic chickens expressing the 3D8 single chain variable fragment protein suppress avian influenza transmission. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):5938.

Platt RJ, Chen S, Zhou Y, Yim MJ, Swiech L, Kempton HR. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell. 2014;159(2):440-55.

Genome edited zygotes. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:2847.

Liu H, Chen Y, Niu Y, Zhang K, Kang Y, Ge W. TALEN-mediated gene mutagenesis in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(3): 323-8.

Lillico SG, Proudfoot C, Carlson DF, Stverakova D, Neil C, Blain C. Live pigs produced from genome edited zygotes. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:2847.

Proudfoot C, Carlson DF, Huddart R, Long CR, Pryor JH, King TJ. Genome edited sheep and cattle. Transgenic Research. 2015;24(1):147-53.

Ni W, Qiao J, Hu S, Zhao X, Regouski M, Yang M. Efficient gene knockout in goats using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plos One. 2014;9(9).

Kantor A, McClements ME, MacLaren RE. CRISPR-Cas9 DNA Base-Editing and Prime-Editing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21: 6240.

Zeballos CM, Gaj T. Next-Generation CRISPR technologies and their applications in gene and cell therapy. Trends Biotechnology. 2021;39:692–705.

Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, Packer MS, Badran AH, Bryson DI, Liu DR. Programmable base editing of A.T to G.C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 2017;551:464–471.

Véron N, Qu Z, Kipen PA, Hirst CE, Marcelle C. CRISPR mediated somatic cell genome engineering in the chicken. Developmental Biology. 2015;407(1): 68- 74.

Cooper CA, Challagulla A, Jenkins KA, Wise TG, O’Neil TE, Morris KR, Tizard ML, Doran TJ. Generation of gene edited birds in one generation using sperm transfection assisted gene editing (STAGE) Transgenic Res. 2017;26:331–347.

Idoko-Akoh A, Taylor L, Sang HM, McGrew MJ. High fidelity CRISPR/Cas9 increases precise monoallelic and biallelic editing events in primordial germ cells. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1-4.

Taylor L, Carlson DF, Nandi S, Sherman A, Fahrenkrug SC, McGrew MJ. Efficient TALEN-mediated gene targeting of chicken primordial germ cells. Development. 2017; 144(5):928-34.

Park TS, Lee HJ, Kim KH, Kim JS, Han JY. Targeted gene knockout in chickens mediated by TALENs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014; 111(35):12716-21.

Ricroch A. Global developments of genome editing in agriculture. Transgenic Res. 2018;28:45–52.

Koslová A, Trefl P, Mucksová J, Reinišová M, Plachý J, Kalina J. Precise CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the NHE1 gene renders chickens resist - ant to the J subgroup of avian leukosis virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(4):2108–12.

Nishida K, Arazoe T, Yachie N, Banno S, Kakimoto M, Tabata M, Mochizuki M, Miyabe A, Araki M, Hara KY. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science. 2016;353:8729.

Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, Packer MS, Badran AH, Bryson DI, Liu DR. Programmable base editing of A.T to G.C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 2017;551:464–471.

Wang F, Zhang W, Yang Q, Kang Y, Fan Y, Wei J, Liu Z, Dai S, Li H, Li Z. Generation of a Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome monkey model by base editing. Protein Cell. 2020;1–16

Matsoukas IG. Prime Editing: Genome Editing for Rare Genetic Diseases Without Double-Strand Breaks or Donor DNA. Front. Genet. 2020;11:11.

Kang KS, Lee HC, Kim HJ, Lee HG, Kim YM, Lee HJ, Park YH, Yang SY, Rengaraj D, Park TS. Spatial and temporal action of chicken primordial germ cells during initial migration. Reproduction. 2015;149:179–187.

Song CL, Zhao XH. Structure and property modification of an oligochitosan-glycosylated and crosslinked soybean protein generated by microbial transglutaminase. Food chemistry. 2014 Nov 15;163:114-9.

Kim GD, Lee JH, Song S, Kim SW, Han JS, Shin SP, Park BC, Park TS. Generation of myostatin-knockout chickens mediated by D10A-Cas9 nickase. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2020;34:5688–5696.

Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Church GM. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–826.

Lee HJ, Yoon JW, Jung KM, Kim YM, Park JS, Lee KY, Park KJ, Hwang YS, Park YH, Rengaraj D. Targeted gene insertion into Z chromosome of chicken primordial germ cells for avian sexing model development. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2019;33:8519–8529.

Cooper CA, Challagulla A, Jenkins KA, Wise TG, O’Neil TE, Morris KR, Tizard ML, Doran TJ. Generation of gene edited birds in one generation using sperm transfection assisted gene editing (STAGE) Transgenic Res. 2017;26:331–347.

Challagulla A, Jenkins KA, O’Neil TE, Morris KR, Wise TG, Tizard ML, Bean AGD, Schat KA, Doran TJ. Germline engineering of the chicken genome using CRISPR/Cas9 by In vivo transfection of PGCs. Anim. Biotechnol. 2020;1–10.

ZhaoX, Liu L, Lang J, Cheng K, Wang Y, Li X, Shi J, Wang Y, Nie G. A CRISPR-Cas13a system for efficient and specific therapeutic targeting of mutant KRAS for pancreatic cancer treatment. Cancer Lett. 2018;431:171–181.

Hu S, Qiao J, Fu Q, Chen C, Ni W, Wujiafu S, Ma S, Zhang H, Sheng J, Wang P. Transgenic shRNA pigs reduce susceptibility to foot and mouth disease virus infection. Elife. 2015;4:e06951.

Lee HJ, Lee KY, Jung KM, Park KJ, Lee KO, Suh JY, Yao Y, Nair V, Han JY. Precise gene editing of chicken Na+/H+ exchange type 1 (chNHE1) confers resistance to avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2017; 77:340–349.

Feng M, Zhang X. Immunity to avian leukosis virus: Where are we now and what should we do? Front Immunol. 2016; 7(4):624.

Dai B, Wipf D. Diagnosing and enhancing VAE models. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1903.05789. 2019 Mar 14.

Feng M, Zhang N, Xie T, Ren F, Cao Z, Zeng X. Chichen type III interferon produced by silkworm bioreactor induces ISG expression and restricts ALV-J infection in vitro. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(20):8473–83.

Mo G, Hu B, Zhang Q, Ruan Z, Li W, Liang J. DPRLR cause the diferences in immune responses between early and late feathered chickens after ALV-J infection. Vet Res. 2022;53(1):1.

Liao C, Chen S, Chen W, Liu Y, Sun B, Li H. Single nucleotide polymorphism variants within tva and tvb receptor genes in Chinese chickens. Poultry Science. 2014;93(10):2482–9.

Zhao J, Lai L, Ji W, Zhou Q. Genome editing in large animals: Current status and future prospects. National Science Review. 2019;6(3):402-420.

Sid H, Schusser B. Applications of gene editing in chickens: A new era is on the horizon. Front Genet. 2018;9:456.

Lee J, Kim DH, Lee K. Current approaches and applications in avian genome editing. International Journal of Molecular Science. 2020;21(11):3937.

Koslová A, Kučerová D, Reinišová M, Geryk J, Trefl P, Hejnar J. Genetic resistance to avian leukosis viruses induced by CRISPR/Cas9 editing of specifc receptor genes in chicken cells. Viruses. 2018;10(11):605.

Kheimar A, Klinger R, Bertzbach LD, Sid H, Yu Y, Conradie A. A genetically engineered commercial chicken line is resistant to highly pathogenic avian leukosis virus subgroup. J Microorganisms. 2021;9(5):1066.

Koslová A, Trefl P, Mucksová J, Krchlíková V, Plachý J, Krijt J. Knockout of retrovirus receptor gene Tva in the chicken confers resistance to avian leukosis virus subgroups A and K and afects cobalamin (vitamin B12)-dependent level of methylmalonic acid. Viruses. 2021;13(12): 2504.

UN. Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. United Nations; New York, NY, USA; 2015.

Hellmich R, Sid H, Lengyel K, Flisikowski K, Schlickenrieder A, Bartsch D. Acquiring resistance against a retroviral infection via CRISPR/Cas9 targeted genome editing in a commercial chicken line. Front Genome Ed. 2020;2:3.

Aiello D, Patel K, Lasagna E. The myostatin gene: An overview of mechanisms of action and its relevance to livestock animals. Anim. Genet. 2018;49: 505–519.

Rexroad C, Vallet J, Matukumalli LK, Reecy J, Bickhart D, Blackburn H, Boggess M, Cheng H, Clutter A, Cockett N. Genome to Phenome: Improving Animal Health, Production, and Well-Being—A New USDA Blueprint for Animal Genome Research 2018–2027. Front. Genet. 2019; 10:327.

Li B, Clohisey SM, Chia BS, Wang B, Cui A, Eisenhaure T, Schweitzer LD, Hoover P, Parkinson NJ, Nachshon A. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies host dependency factors for influenza A virus infection. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:164.

Shanthalingam S, Tibary A, Beever JE, Kasinathan P, Brown WC, Srikumaran S. Precise gene editing paves the way for derivation of Mannheimia haemolytica leukotoxin-resistant cattle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:13186–13190.

Lee HJ, Lee KY, Jung KM, Park KJ, Lee KO, Suh JY, Yao Y, Nair V, Han JY. Precise gene editing of chicken Na+/H+ exchange type 1 (chNHE1) confers resistance to avian leukosis virus subgroup J (ALV-J) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2017;77: 340–349.

Long JS, Giotis ES, Moncorge O, Frise R, Mistry B, James J, Morisson M, Iqbal M, Vignal A, Skinner MA. Species difference in ANP32A underlies influenza A virus polymerase host restriction. Nature. 2016; 529:101–104.

FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2019a.

Allendorf, Fred W, Paul A. Hohenlohe, and Gordon Luikart. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nature reviews genetics. 2010;11(10):697-709.

Esvelt KM, Gemmell NJ. Conservation demands safe gene drive. Plos Biology. 2017;15(11):e2003850.

Xu K, Zhang X, Liu Z, Ruan J, Xu C, Che J, Fan Z, Mu Y, Li K. A transgene-free method for rapid and efficient generation of precisely edited pigs without monoclonal selection. Sci. China Life Sci. 2022;1–12.